Lawsuit Updates & Fact Checks

Smartmatic is taking steps to defend its reputation from attacks by actors trying to further their agendas and profits. These attacks don’t just hurt Smartmatic. They damage the credibility and integrity of all elections, and disparage the hard work of election officials, administrators and poll workers around the world.

Smartmatic files defamation claims against Newsmax and OANN | November 3, 2021
Coming on the one-year anniversary of the 2020 US presidential election, Smartmatic is charging that the defendants knowingly and deliberately disseminated a continuous stream of falsehoods that harmed Smartmatic and negatively impacted the company’s business.

Read the press release here

Read the full claim against OANN here

Read the full claim against Newsmax Media here


News articles:

CNN: Smartmatic is now suing Newsmax and OAN for 'disinformation campaign' | November 3,2021
Bloomblerg: Smartmatic Sues Newsmax, OAN Over Election-Fraud Claims | November 3, 2021
Reuters: Newsmax, One America News sued by voting technology firm Smartmatic | November 3, 2021
Axios:Smartmatic sues Newsmax and OANN for defamation | November 4, 2021

Smartmatic defends its case before the New York State Court | August 17, 2021
After the oral argument held virtually with New York State Judge David Cohen, Smartmatic remains confident in the factual and legal underpinnings of its claims against Fox News and co-defendants.

News articles:

CNBC: Judge grills lawyers for Fox News, Powell, Giuliani about election fraud claims in $2.7 billion Smartmatic defamation suit | August 17, 2021
Bloomberg: Fox News Asks N.Y. Judge to Toss $2.7 Billion Election Suit | August 17, 2021
Reuters: Judge questions Fox News bid to shake $2.7 billion Smartmatic election suit
| August 17, 2021

Smartmatic files opposition brief against motions to dismiss lawsuit | April 12, 2021
Smartmatic’s filing sets forth, in detail, the substantial basis that it has for its claims and asks the court to deny the motions. Smartmatic asserts that it has a straightforward case that is in line with black letter law. The totality of Smartmatic’s allegations show the Fox defendants knew their statements were false or demonstrated reckless disregard for the truth. 

Read the full brief here

News articles

The New York Times: Smartmatic Says Disinformation on Fox News About the Election Was ‘No Accident.’ | April 12, 2021

Vanity Fair: Smartmatic Calls Bulls--T On Fox’s First Amendment Argument | April 13, 2021

Smartmatic files $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox Corporation | February 4, 2021
“Fox News engaged in a conspiracy to spread disinformation about Smartmatic. They lied, and they did so knowingly and intentionally. Smartmatic seeks to hold them accountable for those lies,” said Smartmatic’s attorney J. Erik Connolly, Vice Chair of the Litigation Practice Group, at Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, LLP.

Read the press release here

Read the full complaint here

News articles

Insider: Election-Technology Company Smartmatic Files $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Against Fox News Over Election Conspiracy Theories | February 4, 2021
CNBC: Dominion and Smartmatic Have Serious Shot at Victory in Election Disinformation Suits, Experts Say | February 24, 2021

Smartmatic demands justice with retraction demand letters | December 14, 2020
Smartmatic issued legal notices and retraction demand letters to Fox News, Newsmax and OANN for publishing false and defamatory statements. The demand letters identify dozens of factually inaccurate statements made by each of the organizations as part of a “disinformation campaign” to injure Smartmatic and discredit the 2020 U.S. election.

Read the press release here

News articles

AP: Company Targeted by Vote Fraud Claims Strikes Back at Trump | December 14, 2020
The New York Times: The ‘Red Slime’ Lawsuit That Could Sink Right-Wing Media | December 20, 2020

Smartmatic Fact check

Smartmatic’s credibility is our most important asset. To be trusted partners to governments and election officials we need to be transparent and forthright. Here are the facts about our company and our history. No spin. No polish.

You can find a list of independent fact-check organizations published by the University of California here and from American University here. (Smartmatic has no relationship to either of these universities or their lists. We offer them only as resources to help your own efforts to fact check.)

Our role in the US 2020 election

  • Smartmatic technology was used only in Los Angeles County, California in the 2020 election. The system we provided to LA County does not count, tabulate or store votes.
  • Smartmatic did not provide any hardware or software or services to Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, or Arizona during the 2020 US election, nor did we supply any other voting technology servicing those states.
  • There are no ties between Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic – plain and simple. No ownership ties, no software leasing, no business at all between them. In 2009, (more than a decade ago) Smartmatic licensed scanning machines from Dominion for use in The Philippines for a Smartmatic election project.

Our company history, ownership and products

  • Smartmatic’s software was developed by our own engineers to do three things: accurately process votes, keep them secure and facilitate audits. That’s it. There is no other agenda. Our technology has been proven in audited elections for almost 20 years.
  • Smartmatic election technologies and services have been authenticated by independent third-party validators, including the US Election Assistance Commission, the State of California, PriceWaterhouseCoopers and SLI Global. They have also been validated by world-renowned institutions such as the Carter Center, the United Nations, the Organization of American States, and the European Union.
  • Smartmatic has no ties to governments or political parties. Governments are clients with whom we do business – just like every other commercial entity. We do not have any alliances or relationships with any politician, political party, PAC, or government. Smartmatic’s founders and employees adhere to a strict ethics code that, among other things, prohibits them from making political donations.
  • Smartmatic does not have any ties to any national leader, living or dead, in the US or any other country.
  • Two of the founders, Antonio Mugica and Roger Piñate, run the company as CEO and President, respectively. The majority of company shares are held by the Mugica and Piñate families. The remaining shares (less than 20%) are held by employees and investors.
  • George Soros has no ownership interest in Smartmatic, nor is he an investor. He’s not on the Board or otherwise employed by Smartmatic. He never has been. That’s been proven time and again.   
  • The founders of Smartmatic were born in Venezuela. The company, however, was founded in Boca Raton, Florida in 2000 and still maintains its US base there. Tesla, Procter & Gamble, Kohl’s, TJ Maxx,, Google and many other American companies were founded by people born outside the US. A US company is still a US company, regardless of where its founders or shareholders happened to be born.
  • Smartmatic has only owned one election company in the US, Sequoia Voting Systems. Smartmatic sold the company in 2007 to Sequoia’s management team. More than three years later Sequoia was bought by Dominion Voting Systems. Smartmatic had no part in Sequoia’s acquisition by Dominion.
  • Smartmatic does not have any operations in Venezuela. We did election projects in Venezuela from 2004 to 2017, and Smartmatic’s equipment, software and people all performed successfully every time. In 2017, our technology helped prove that the government was reporting false turnout numbers – so we blew the whistle on them – and stopped doing business there at that time.
  • Smartmatic has never sold any voting machines in Myanmar, Bolivia, Nicaragua or Spain.